Age Ban enforcement in Australia has reached a significant milestone, with Snapchat confirming that it has blocked or disabled more than 415,000 accounts belonging to users under the age of 16. The action comes as part of Australia’s landmark social media restrictions, which took effect on December 10 and require major platforms to prevent minors from maintaining accounts. The move underscores the government’s determination to strengthen child safety online, while also revealing challenges in implementing age verification at scale.
According to Snapchat, the accounts were removed by the end of January, and the platform continues to disable additional profiles daily. The company acknowledged the intent behind the Age Ban but cautioned that enforcement gaps remain, particularly in the accuracy and reliability of existing age estimation technologies. These systems, Snapchat said, typically have a margin of error of two to three years, which can allow some underage users to slip through while mistakenly blocking those who are legally eligible.
Age Ban Pressures Platforms as Penalties Loom
Under the new rules, platforms including Snapchat, Meta, TikTok, and YouTube are legally required to take “reasonable steps” to prevent users under 16 from holding accounts. Failure to comply can result in fines of up to 49.5 million Australian dollars, making the Age Ban one of the strictest social media regulations in the world. Australia’s eSafety Commissioner has already reported that tech companies collectively blocked around 4.7 million accounts in the early phase of enforcement, calling the results “significant.”
Snapchat, while cooperating with authorities, has argued that responsibility should not rest solely with social media platforms. The company has urged regulators to require app stores to verify users’ ages before allowing downloads, describing this as a more centralized and consistent safeguard. According to Snapchat, app-level checks could raise the barrier for circumvention and improve overall compliance with the Age Ban.
Age Ban Sparks Debate Over Technology and Youth Access
The debate around the Age Ban has exposed a broader tension between child protection and digital access. Snapchat emphasized that age estimation tools are imperfect and warned that relying on them alone could reduce protections for some minors while unfairly restricting older teenagers. The platform echoed similar calls made by Meta, arguing that app store-based verification would distribute responsibility more evenly across the digital ecosystem.
Despite its cooperation, Snapchat has also questioned whether an outright inclusion of its service under the Age Ban is appropriate. The company maintains that its platform functions primarily as a private messaging service rather than a public social network. Cutting off teenagers from communication with close friends and family, Snapchat argued, may not necessarily make them safer or better off.
Age Ban Highlights Global Shift in Social Media Regulation
Australia’s approach is being closely watched by governments worldwide as concerns grow over the impact of social media on young people’s mental health, privacy, and exposure to harmful content. Supporters of the Age Ban say it sends a strong signal to tech companies to prioritize safety by design, while critics warn of unintended consequences and enforcement complexities.
Australian authorities have maintained that the legislation is about accountability rather than punishment. Officials argue that requiring platforms to actively prevent underage access forces meaningful investment in safety systems and cultural change within the tech industry. The eSafety regulator has indicated that dialogue with companies will continue as enforcement evolves.
Related: Snapchat Faces Growth Challenge as Q2 Revenue Slows Amid Ad System Glitch
Age Ban Enforcement Continues Amid Ongoing Review
As enforcement of the Age Ban continues, regulators are expected to review its effectiveness and address technological gaps. Snapchat has stated that it understands the government’s objectives and supports protecting young users online, even as it seeks refinements to the current framework.
The coming months will likely determine whether Australia’s world-first restrictions can balance child safety, technological feasibility, and fair access. What is clear is that the Age Ban has already reshaped how social media platforms operate in the country, setting a precedent that could influence digital policy far beyond Australia’s borders.
